Galectin-3 as a Novel Biomarker for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Galectin-3 has been shown to play a key pathophysiological role in pulmonary associated inflammatory response and lung fibrosis in COVID-19 and is a mediator for viral adhesion. However, there is limited data about its potential role in severity and prognosis of COVID-19. This study aimed to investigate the predictive role of serum galectin-3 concentrations in the severe clinical outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: the severity of pneumonia, in-hospital mortality, and the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. METHODS: This single-center study included 68 patients with laboratory- and radiologically-confirmed COVID-19 admitted to our emergency department. The study population was divided into patients with primary clinical out-comes (n = 32) and those without (n = 36). The need for ICU admission and/or in-hospital mortality were the primary clinical endpoints. The study group was also classified based on pneumonia severity: severe or mild/moderate. Blood samples were collected within 48 hours of admission to estimate serum galectin-3 concentrations. RESULTS: Multivariate regression analysis showed that lower concentrations of galectin-3 and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were independently associated with the primary clinical outcomes (OR = 0.951, p = 0.035; OR = 0.862, p = 0.017, respectively); increased concentrations of galectin-3 were an independent predictor of severe pneumonia (OR = 1.087, p = 0.016). In the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, serum galectin-3 concentrations at hospital admission predicted pneumonia severity with 52.1% sensitivity and 90% specificity with a cutoff of 38.76 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Circulating galectin-3 at hospital admission could be a useful biomarker for identifying COVID-19 patients at high risk for severe pneumonia.

Wide QRS Complex and Lateral ST-T Segment Abnormality Are Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients.

BACKGROUND: The information on electrocardiographic features of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. Our aim was to determine if baseline electrocardiographic features of hospitalized COVID-19 patients are associated with markers of myocardial injury and clinical outcomes. METHODS: In this retrospective, single center cohort study, we included 223 hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Clinical, electrocardiographic and laboratory data were collected and analyzed. Primary composite endpoint of mortality, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, or admission to the intensive care unit was assessed. RESULTS: Forty patients (17.9%) reached the primary composite endpoint. Patients with the primary composite endpoint were more likely to have wide QRS complex (>120 ms) and lateral ST-T segment abnormality. The multivariable Cox regression showed increasing odds of the primary composite endpoint associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (odds ratio 7.76, 95% CI 2.67-22.59; p < 0.001), acute cardiac injury (odds ratio 3.14, 95% CI 1.26-7.99; p = 0.016), high flow oxygen therapy (odds ratio 2.43, 95% CI 1.05-5.62; p = 0.037) and QRS duration longer than >120 ms (odds ratio 3.62, 95% CI 1.39-9.380; p = 0.008) Patients with a wide QRS complex (>120 ms) had significantly higher median level of troponin T and pro-BNP than those without it. Patients with abnormality of lateral ST-T segment had significantly higher median level of troponin T and pro-BNP than patients without. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of QRS duration longer than 120 ms and lateral ST-T segment abnormality were associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher levels of myocardial injury biomarkers.

Cardiovascular view of intermediate and high-risk COVID-19 patients: single-centre experience with low mortality and intensive care hospitalisation rates.

AIM: The purpose of this article was to report the low rates of intensive care unit admission and mortality in intermediate- and high-risk COVID-19 patients, and to share our clinical approach with other colleagues. In addition, we sought to reveal the relationship between myocardial injury and clinical outcomes such as death, intensive care unit uptake and hospital stay, and the relationship between inflammatory parameters and cardiac biomarkers in a cardiovascular perspective. METHODS: Patients admitted to the emergency department in the Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, with laboratory or clinically and radiologically confirmed COVID-19 were included in this retrospective cross-sectional study, which was conducted from 11 March to 10 April 2020. The demographic (age and gender) and clinical (symptoms, co-morbidities, treatments, complications and outcomes) characteristics, laboratory findings, and results of cardiac examinations (cardiac biomarkers and electrocardiography) of patients during hospitalisation were collected from their medical records by two investigators. Data were analysed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM). A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis began on 11 April 2020. RESULTS: Mortality and intensive care unit admission rates were statistically significantly higher in patients with cardiac injury than in those without. There was a positive correlation between levels of high-sensitivity TNT and fibrinogen, D-dimer, ferritin, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (r = 0.24, p < 0.01; r = 0.37, p < 0.01; r = 0.25, p < 0.01, r = 0.34, p < 0.01; r = 0.31, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The first general data of our 309 patients regarding low mortality and intensive care admission rates, and particular treatment algorithms specific to our centre should be helpful in determining better treatment strategies in the future. Our study emphasises the importance and frequency of cardiovascular outcomes, and the significance of some cardiac biomarkers in predicting COVID-19 prognosis.

Serum Endocan Levels on Admission Are Associated With Worse Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients: A Pilot Study.

Thrombotic and embolic complications in the cardiovascular system are evident and associated with worse prognosis in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Endothelial-specific molecule 1 (endocan) plays a role in vascular pathology. We hypothesized serum endocan levels on admission are associated with primary composite end point (mortality and intensive care unit hospitalization) in COVID-19 patients. Patients (n = 80) with laboratory, clinical, and radiological confirmed COVID-19 were included in this cross-sectional study. Ten milliliter of peripheral venous blood were drawn within 24 hours of admission to estimate serum endocan levels. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26.0 (IBM). Patients with the primary composite end point had significantly higher serum endocan levels than patients without (852.2 ± 522.7 vs 550.2 ± 440.8 ng/L, respectively; P < .01). In the logistic regression analysis, only increased serum endocan levels and increase in age were independent predictors of the primary composite end point (P < .05). In the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, we found that a serum endocan level of 276.4 ng/L had a 97% sensitivity and 85% specificity for prediction of the primary composite end point. Baseline serum endocan levels may prove useful as a prognostic factor in patients hospitalized for COVID-19.